For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents such as my encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure--one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.
- David Rockefeller's Memoirs (Random House, New York, 2002)
Obama's call to spare no time injecting the economy with more toxic debt, is being echoed by that paradigm of virtue and TurboTax hacker extraordinaire, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner. BreitBart reports that Geithner is advising that the globalist cabal called the G7, of which he himself is a member, should act "promptly to restore health to the global economy".
Now requesting that a doctor act promptly when a patient stop breathing makes sense. However, if that doctor is not a doctor at all and is instead eager to perform untested and cruel experiments on anything available to him, the request should be withheld.
You know, whenever I write about the economy, I always do a little research and investigation. Inevitably I always find that old, incongruous and dirty connection between the economy and the weather. Climate change, the biggest scam since Ponzi himself is not only a great way to instill fear and therefore weakness amongst the hoi polloi, but it is also a great way to make an enormous amount of cash at the expense of the self-righteous idiots (like Netflix's Reed Hastings, the poster-boy for moron) who are already opening up their wallets and demanding that everyone else follow suit. For the global elites who control the world's central banks and economic policies, climate change mythology is a tool for control and playing God; for the people, it is an explanation for their guilt and misery: it is a new religion.
For on the seventh day, the Gang of Seven sat down together at the table and wrote up the following:
Group of Seven 1988 Economic Declaration, Toronto
"We agree that the protection and enhancement of the environment is essential. The report of the World Commission on Environment and Development has stressed that environmental considerations must be integrated into all areas of economic policymaking if the globe is to continue to support humankind. We endorse the concept of sustainable development. Threats to the environment recognize no boundaries....The Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer is a milestone. ...Further action is needed. Global climate change, air, sea and fresh water pollution, acid rain, hazardous substances, deforestation and endangered species require priority attention." Group of Seven 1988 Economic Declaration, Toronto, Canada
"We the Participants in the Lyon Summit....discussed how we could build a better international system to secure security and stability...In an increasingly inter-dependent and inter-active world with rapid globalization in progress, we renewed our determination to work together amongst us and in partnership with leaders of other countries..." - Women's International Media Group
And the G7 said it was good and the G7 elected itself. The G7 includes financial ministers (for the U.S., this would be the Treasury Secretary) of seven nations: Germany, France, Italy, Canada, Japan, the U.K. and the U.S.A. Regardless of how their respective countries elected or appointed them, these men consider themselves to be oligarchic dictators when it comes to the world economy. Of course they would not call it that. They would describe their group as being "guardians". But what are they guardians of? The truth is that they are guardians of the interests of the U.N.
One of the most amazing things for the writer is that while she has read a fair amount of UN Programmes of Action in the last several years, it was her impression that all of the "recommendations" made came from the United Nations, however, in reading the Group of Seven documents, it appears that these recommendations originate from the Group of Seven who direct the United Nations, (that's us) where they need to go and what they need to do in order to come into compliance with the wishes of this global body.
The writer asked by Canadian Prime Minister Paul Cretien and European Commission President Jacques Santer "Who does the Group of Seven report to? The United Nations? Or does the United Nations report to the G7?" Both of these men basically said that no one reports to anyone, that the G7 come out of the UN and that they both have the same global concerns. The better question should have been, "Who does the G7 report to?" - Women's International Media Group
The U.N. would never force the peoples of the world to give up their monies and savings. What they would rather do is persuade them that they must. We see this persuasion happening on a local (national level) right now and I write about it almost daily. In the U.S., our own government is in the process of marrying corporations to itself by creating financial dependencies, regulations and incentives for those who comply. Companies who get in bed with the government will win. Those who don't, lose.
Democrats in the audience applauded when Ballmer (CEO of Microsoft Corp) endorsed the so-called stimulus legislation currently being considered by the U.S. Congress, saying it is "vital" and "will provide a cushion as we reach the reset point and it will help restart our economic engine."
Ballmer was probably an even bigger hit with the government when he blamed the private sector for the current crisis. Microsoft is also a big supporter of climate change regulation and intrusion. It even has its own policy. Compare it to USCAP, in which General Electric is an active member. Now go explore the U.N. They are all just friends of friends. Those on the outside of this circle? Well, you are going to have to some tough times ahead:
Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order [referring to the 1991 LA Riot]. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were an outside threat from beyond [i.e., an "extraterrestrial" invasion], whether real or *promulgated* [emphasis mine], that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this *scenario*, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government.
- Dr. Henry Kissinger, Bilderberger Conference, Evians, France, 1991
The evil is exactly We the People. We are told a la Ballmer that we are not only greedy private folk who can't keep out of debt, but we are also the causes of global climate change. Ballmer is one man, yes. But he is just one head of the hydra. Climate change works as a much better manufactured evil than war because climate change weakens the population by not conjuring up warlike emotions and behaviors. It instills a deep and debilitating pacifism and altruism that will enable our global power-hungry leaders to demand (and easily get) not only our money via taxes and inflation, but also our work, our children and our entire lives - for the common good of the planet. Peoples of the developed nations - if the U.N. plans succeed - will give up everything to save the world and they will do so willingly, by sending their children to schools that indoctrinate in environmental mythology, by controlling the currency and tax system in a way that will not allow the people to accumulate too much private wealth, by confiscating or making it difficult to purchase guns and ammo and, finally, by infecting the educational system to such an extent that America's legacy will be destroyed and she will be beyond recognition, if she will be at all.
We've got to ride the global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing -- in terms of economic policy and environmental policy." Timothy Wirth, former U.S. Senator (D-Colorado), Current President of the United Nations Foundation and Better World Fund
Cross-Posted on Modern Conservative
