"Change the values and take a different course of living, then evolution will continue. Do not forget that from now on you have to be Earth citizens." Robert Muller speaking at the Global Citizenship 2000 Youth Congress
There has been much talk on net regarding Obama's "senior foreign affairs advisor" Robert Malley. Malley has never been, based on his writings, shy about offering critique of Israel and its policies in relation to Hamas and the Palestinian state, however he continually asserts that his criticism is always constructive criticism. He points at AIPAC as being far-right,"neocon" and fascist in its policies regarding Israel, and so has been involved in the creation of a new left pro-Israel lobby, J-Street. J-Street is to AIPAC as Obama is to Bush. Nothing in the world is an accident.
So Malley feigns to be an objective and unbiased observer in the conflicts in the Middle East, and he appears to treat Israel and Hamas as if one were apples and other oranges, with neither fruit getting along in the fruit bowl. In other words, he employs moral equivalence and the appearance of impartiality in order to persuade his readers to his point of view, a point of view that is nothing less than the destruction of Israel, Zionism and American moral ties to both. Robert Malley, if he is not an anti-Semite, is a globalist looking forward to the eradication of both national and cultural identities and self-defense of these identities. Malley is an "Earth citizen", so he doesn't care a wit about citizens of anywhere else.
Apparently, Malley believes that the U.S. broad-brushes murderers and rabid anti-Semites and that we do not analyze our enemies or understand them enough. This, he claims, is why we will ultimately fail before our enemies.
ON THE third anniversary of the US invasion in Iraq, the United States is still fighting an enemy it barely knows. Washington relies on crude, broad-brush identifications -- Saddamists, Islamofascists, and the like. Rather than analyze the armed opposition's strategy and objectives, it assumes them. Rather than listen to what the insurgents say, it dismisses it. All of which is mystifying and, of far greater importance, self-defeating. - The Enemy We Hardly Know
Oh really? We don't know the enemy? Where do I begin here. Let's just take a look at the "enemy", the one we don't understand. I guess we could start with the assertion that Hamas is a radical Islamic organization hell bent on the destruction of Israel and America in order to establish Islam throughout the world. To gain familiarity with its principles, one need go no further than the Hamas Charter:
That Hamas is an Islamic organization is decidedly true, based on Articles 1,2 and 3:
"The Islamic Resistance Movement draws its guidelines from Islam;
derives from it its thinking, interpretations and views about existence, life and humanity;
refers back to it for its conduct; and is inspired by it in whatever step it takes." - Article 1
and,
"The basic structure of the Islamic Resistance Movement consists of Muslims who are devoted to Allah and worship Him verily [as it is written]: “I have created Man and Devil for the purpose of their worship” [of Allah]. Those Muslims are cognizant of their duty towards themselves, their families and country and they have been relying on Allah for all that. They have raised the banner of Jihad in the face of the oppressors in order to extricate the country and the people from the [oppressors’] desecration, filth and evil."
Hamas' primary intention - one that it shares with Iran - is to wipe Israel and all Jews off the face of the map:
"Israel will rise and will remain erect until Islam eliminates it as it had eliminated its predecessors."
"our struggle against the Jews is extremely wide-ranging and grave, so much so that it will need all the loyal efforts we can wield, to be followed by further steps and reinforced by successive battalions from the multifarious Arab and Islamic world, until the enemies are defeated and Allah’s victory prevails."
"The prophet, prayer and peace be upon him, said: The time will not come until Muslims will fight the Jews (and kill them); until the Jews hide behind rocks and trees, which will cry: O Muslim! there is a Jew hiding behind me, come on and kill him! This will not apply to the Gharqad, which is a Jewish tree (cited by Bukhari and Muslim)."
"We cannot fail to remind every Muslim that when the Jews occupied Holy Jerusalem in 1967 and stood at the doorstep of the Blessed Aqsa Mosque, they shouted with joy: “Muhammad is dead, he left daughters behind.” Israel, by virtue of its being Jewish and of having a Jewish population, defies Islam and the Muslims. "
Hamas has no intention of creating, let alone keeping peace between Palestine and Israel or the "unbelievers". Even worse, it regards peace talks as simply a waste of time, as indicated in Article 13:
[Peace] initiatives, the so-called peaceful solutions, and the international conferences to resolve the Palestinian problem, are all contrary to the beliefs of the Islamic Resistance Movement. For renouncing any part of Palestine means renouncing part of the religion; ...There is no solution to the Palestinian problem except by Jihad. The initiatives, proposals and International Conferences are but a waste of time, an exercise in futility. - Article 13.
So in Hamas we have, on one hand, a worldwide radical Islamic organization that will stop at nothing to destroy the Jews and all other unbelievers in the world. On the other hand, we have our so-called "expert" on Middle East affairs, Robert Malley, who, in feigning to be an objective observer of his subject matter, is in fact, an implicit supporter and apologizer of terrorism and the terrorist entity, Hamas. He has helped to create J Street which asserts that it wants to help create two states: Palestinian and Israel, which is laughable considering that Hamas has no intentions of sharing the world with Jews at all. J Street also rejects any military reaction towards Iran. Well, hope that works out for Israel if Iran points the bomb directly facing them. Seriously, WHO exactly is not listening to our enemies here?
Now why would Malley really take the absurd position that he does, a position that denies a small country the right to self defense in the face of rabid enemies intent on its destruction? The answer is pretty simple, if one looks the organization for which he works so laboriously namely, the International Crisis group. ICG's general mission "to prevent conflict worldwide", and it is a mission that is in accord with the mission of the United Nations itself, in regards to establishing world peace and the end of national sovereignty of nations. In other words, ICG is in the service of creating the eventual "One World Government".
Now ICG is a group funded by billionaire George Soros. Yes, him again. Now what does Soros think about Israel? Well, he does not believe that the U.S. should support the Israeli government if support means defending Israel against groups who want to destroy it. Better to be destroyed and preserve peace, than to fight back and destroy peace.
The Bush administration is once again in the process of committing a major policy blunder in the Middle East, one that is liable to have disastrous consequences and is not receiving the attention it should. This time it concerns the Israeli–Palestinian relationship. The Bush administration is actively supporting the Israeli government in its refusal to recognize a Palestinian unity government that includes Hamas, which the US State Department considers a terrorist organization. This precludes any progress toward a peace settlement at a time when progress on the Palestinian problem could help avert a conflagration in the greater Middle East... Israel, with the strong backing of the United States, refused to recognize the democratically elected Hamas government and withheld payment of the millions in taxes collected by the Israelis on its behalf. This caused great economic hardship and undermined the ability of the government to function. But it did not reduce popular support for Hamas among Palestinians, and it reinforced the position of Islamic and other extremists who oppose negotiations with Israel. The situation deteriorated to the point where Palestine no longer had an authority with whom it would have been possible for Israel to negotiate. - On Israel, America and AIPAC
Soros' view is entirely compatible with Malley's. The above quote is take from an article that also addresses attacks upon critics of AIPAC. He complains that the Jewish lobby is downright fascist in its suppression of criticism and its power of American politicians. Soros wants us to believe that his criticisms on Israeli and Bush policies are actually in the interest of Israel and that it is the corrupt AIPAC that is actually going to cause the potential destruction of Israel. Soros, like Obama, wants to negotiate with terrorists, with murderers and fanatics, and he wants to do so regardless of who they are and what they say they intend to do. That Soros actually thinks his position is for the good of Israel, if it were not so vile, would be laughable.
So Soros is on the board of the International Crisis Group. Also sitting proudly on the board is former United States National Security Advisor to President Jimmy Carter, Zbigniew Brzezinski, who shares the same perspective on AIPAC as Soros:
Mr Brzezinski said "it's not unique to the Jewish community – but there is a McCarthyite tendency among some people in the Jewish community", referring to the Republican senator who led the anti-Communist witch hunt in the 1950s.
"They operate not by arguing but by slandering, vilifying, demonizing. They very promptly wheel out anti-Semitism. There is an element of paranoia in this inclination to view any serious attempt at a compromised peace as somehow directed against Israel." Telegraph
Now, whether or not these men are actually anti-Semitics, can neither be known nor proven either way. What is clear however is that they are, in accordance with the U.N.'s mission for global peace (slavery), supporting the destruction of national identity and national defense, in the case of both Israel and the U.S. Or, if they are not supporting the destruction of it, they are supporting its submission to it, to a new world order.
Again, that word "submission", which is in fact the meaning of the word Islam.
Technorati Tags:
Brzezinski,
Soros,
Obama,
Malley,
One World Order,
United Nations,
Hamas,
israel,
AIPAC,
J Street,
Jews,
anti-semitism del.icio.us Tags:
Brzezinski,
Soros,
Obama,
Malley,
One World Order,
United Nations,
Hamas,
israel,
AIPAC,
J Street,
Jews,
anti-semitism